@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form

[Johannes Pfau]

Am Thu, 28 May 2020 20:59:19 +0000 schrieb Ethan:

> On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 20:55:23 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
>> But the DIP text itself did not convince the other language maintainer.
>> A phone call did. It did not go through on its own merits.
> 
> Even with a board of more than two members, I'd expect them to discuss
> dissenting opinions before coming to a conclusion.
> 
> Discussion isn't a problem here, it's impartiality (and lack thereof).

To put it more explicitly, discussion between review board members is 
expected.

Discussion between DIP author and review board considering technical 
details: I'm not sure. Ideally a DIP should convey all important 
information on its own. A direct technical discussion between DIP author 
and review board is then not necessary.

-- 
Johannes