@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form

Gregory g.thompson.1892 at gmall.com
Fri May 29 11:14:31 UTC 2020


On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 05:03:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 04:27:18 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
>  "It's messed up that a DIP author can decide on his own 
> proposal" is very different from a broad claim like "the DIP 
> process is broken".

Not that different. All the more reason for the DIP process to be 
fixed than leave it the way it is. You are just arguing semantics 
at this point to try and avoid bad PR. You care more about public 
imagine than due process. That's backwards.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list