Discussion Thread: DIP 1037--Add Unary Operator ...--Community Review Round 1

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 11/2/20 9:30 PM, Manu wrote:
> It's very hard to express a grammar change in a DIP like this, since D 
> doesn't have a grammar as such; it's just an implementation, and 
> reverse-engineering a grammar from the implementation is imprecise. 
> Perhaps my implementation implies additional grammar changes that I 
> didn't notice.

I thought the grammar is fairly complete, no? It's the semantics that's 
poorly defined.