Better branding of -betterC

Ola Fosheim Grøstad ola.fosheim.grostad at
Tue Nov 3 11:58:35 UTC 2020

On Tuesday, 3 November 2020 at 10:25:15 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
> Apart of a the ugliness of modern C++, many of the modern 
> features are implemented in such a way it is difficult to make 
> it freestanding from STL. You do not want STL in embedded 
> systems.

Which C++ features depend on STL? I can't think of any... STL is 
ok for protyping.
They are working on providing exceptions as return values for 

D needs that as well.

> Is modern C++ good for embedded systems?

Define modern C++?

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list