Better branding of -betterC
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 11:58:35 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 3 November 2020 at 10:25:15 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
> Apart of a the ugliness of modern C++, many of the modern
> features are implemented in such a way it is difficult to make
> it freestanding from STL. You do not want STL in embedded
Which C++ features depend on STL? I can't think of any... STL is
ok for protyping.
They are working on providing exceptions as return values for
D needs that as well.
> Is modern C++ good for embedded systems?
Define modern C++?
More information about the Digitalmars-d