proposal: short => rewrite for function declarations

[Imperatorn]

On Saturday, 10 October 2020 at 10:18:15 UTC, claptrap wrote:
> On Friday, 9 October 2020 at 14:44:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> [...]
>
> From the recent discussions I got the impression that needless 
> syntax sugar shouldn't be added any more. To get new features 
> in it needs to be something that cant be done with existing 
> language features, or it needs to fix something.
>
> So doesn't this just add more "stuff" for no meaningful benefit?
>
> I couldnt care less about
>
> @property x() => _x;
>
> vs
>
> @property x() { return -x; }
>
> cause the important thing to me is that my code is simple, 
> readable, expressive, i dont care about saving 7 chars on a one 
> liner.

What do you mean. It removes stuff. I'd say Adam's proposal is 
more readable.