Postmortem: Template unittests are bad & you shouldn't catch Error

[Kagamin]

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 09:03:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Regardless of what's correct or not, I think there must be a 
> way to have unit tests keep running after a failed test. 
> Otherwise D will have very poor experience for unit test 
> frameworks. It's already bad enough with the default unit test 
> runner that aborts the rest of the unit tests inside a module 
> after a failed test (it will continue with other modules).

FWIW ldc performs unwinding optimizations only in release 
compilation mode and not in others.