__traits(parent) bug?

[Stefan Koch]

On Saturday, 24 October 2020 at 15:45:03 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:

>
> I'm not sure that this can really be called a bug, per se--the 
> language spec is vague enough to allow either 
> interpretation--but I'd be very surprised if this behavior was 
> intentional.

The rewrite to get the eponymous member is applied to the parent 
:)
Not intentional but a consequence of the rewrite rule.