Feedback Thread: DIP 1037--Add Unary Operator ...--Community Review Round 1

[Manu]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:25 PM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 28 October 2020 at 06:06:41 UTC, Ola Fosheim
> Grøstad wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 10:54:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> >> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
> >> Review of DIP 1037, "Add Unary Operator ...".
> >
> > Avoid qualitative assumptions of whether this is a success in
> > c++ or not. This is actually a maginal c++ feature that does
> > not fit well with the language.
> >
> > Please discuss this feature vs more powerful and generic
> > features like comprehensions.
>
> Discuss the feature/operator in the context of all sequence types
> the language and standard library offers. There is no need for D
> to end up with more special cases.
>
> (Ease of implementation should not be a distinguishing factor,
> that leads to fragmentation in the language design.)
>

What does this mean? What other sequence types do you expect this to apply
to? What special cases are you talking about?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20201028/00b7c2ff/attachment-0001.htm>