Feedback Thread: DIP 1037--Add Unary Operator ...--Community Review Round 1

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Wednesday, 28 October 2020 at 10:48:01 UTC, Manu wrote:
> This doesn't help me.

Well, the DIP should argue the case in relation to all other 
sequence types that are available in the language/standard 
library. If it does not apply, then make an argument for that for 
those specific sequence types. The downside then would be that 
one could argue that the operations are not well designed.

D should try to avoid becoming C++, thus there has to be a strong 
focus on making the language more unified.

The culprit is this: the more C++like D becomes (feature wise, 
core semantics could be like C++), the less reason there is for D 
to exist.