Better branding of -betterC
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 21:45:47 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 29 October 2020 at 14:28:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> I think it's a bad, bad, bad idea to put any emphasis on
> BetterC other than as a tool to help in porting C or C++ code
> to D, or to integrate D into existing C and C++ projects.
Only because it is a poster child. If exceptions were value types
and classes were structs with some extra fields then betterC
would be more attractive.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list