Better branding of -betterC

Thu Oct 29 21:45:47 UTC 2020

On Thursday, 29 October 2020 at 14:28:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> I think it's a bad, bad, bad idea to put any emphasis on 
> BetterC other than as a tool to help in porting C or C++ code 
> to D, or to integrate D into existing C and C++ projects.

Only because it is a poster child. If exceptions were value types 
and classes were structs with some extra fields then betterC 
would be more attractive.