Better branding of -betterC

[Paul Backus]

On Thursday, 29 October 2020 at 21:45:47 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 October 2020 at 14:28:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> I think it's a bad, bad, bad idea to put any emphasis on 
>> BetterC other than as a tool to help in porting C or C++ code 
>> to D, or to integrate D into existing C and C++ projects.
>
> Only because it is a poster child. If exceptions were value 
> types and classes were structs with some extra fields then 
> betterC would be more attractive.

I have a DIP I think you'll like:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/02594a09d9daf1d393ebce2cfc2f0c4f90d4bcf8/DIPs/1NNN-PJB.md