Feedback Thread: DIP 1036--Formatted String Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 1

[Daniel N]

On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 19:21:49 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this proposal is incompatible with 
> scanf.
>
> *) 'scanf' should be added in a section with known limitations.
> *) Can you envision a way to solve this issue, in a future more 
> powerful D, without changing the design of this DIP?

I retract my comment, after reading Adam's and Steven's reply.

I misread a section of the proposal, thinking &var would have to 
be send as a template param, but it doesn't, so it works fine.

Impressive work!