Feedback Thread: DIP 1036--Formatted String Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 1
no at public.email
Tue Sep 8 20:38:18 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 19:21:49 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this proposal is incompatible with
> *) 'scanf' should be added in a section with known limitations.
> *) Can you envision a way to solve this issue, in a future more
> powerful D, without changing the design of this DIP?
I retract my comment, after reading Adam's and Steven's reply.
I misread a section of the proposal, thinking &var would have to
be send as a template param, but it doesn't, so it works fine.
More information about the Digitalmars-d