Discussion Thread: DIP 1036--Formatted String Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 1
james.blachly at gmail.com
Wed Sep 9 23:04:37 UTC 2020
On 9/9/20 5:41 PM, Paul Backus wrote:
> Adding dedicated overloads of writefln, idup, etc. to deal with
> interpolated strings might sound like a good solution, but it doesn't
> scale. The *best-case* scenario is that DIP 1036 creates a bunch of
> meaningless busywork for library maintainers; the more realistic
> scenario is that most libraries never get updated at all, and users have
> to either check every individual function they use for
> interpolated-string compatibility, or defensively spam .idup everywhere
> (at which point, you might as well just make interpolated strings use
> the GC to start with).
This (and the related points about complexity and surprise especially of
new users made by Paul but also by myself and others) make me tend to
believe that we should just add GC-only, implicit automatic conversion
to Dstring, and be done with it.
Are there contemporary examples of other languages whose string
interpolation is as complex as this proposals? I am really only most
management and the *string is a string is a string*.
More information about the Digitalmars-d