OT - Re: More operators inside `is(...)` expressions

[Simen Kjærås]

On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 03:30:17 UTC, dweldon wrote:
> On Saturday, 5 September 2020 at 12:27:19 UTC, Nick Treleaven 
> wrote:
>
>> Titanic, not the engineers. (Plus the Ark is fictional and
>
> That depends on who is telling the narrative.  While secularism 
> captured mainstream science long ago, aided initially by 
> since-proven fraudulent fossil finds, creation science has now 
> advanced to a level that proves evolution false in many, many 
> ways.  You just won't get that information in the mainstream.
>
>> impractical).
>
> The ark design has been investigated by engineers and found to 
> be incredibly seaworthy for what it was designed for.  Not 
> every species that we see today was present on the ark, only a 
> few from each kind was needed.  Rapid speciation occurred after 
> they spread out over the earth, but all still remained within 
> their initial kind.  Eg.  we can trace all dogs today back to 
> wolves, so all that was needed were two wolves on the ark.  
> Similarly for other animals.

Just... no. This is not the place for a debate over pseudoscience.

--
   Simen