I've just fixed UFCS for the experimental type function branch
uplink.coder at googlemail.com
Thu Sep 10 19:59:36 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 17:05:02 UTC, Meta wrote:
> else static if (is(t == A[n], A, size_t n))
> result += A.sizeOf * n
that is expression introduces 2 symbols `n` and `A`
based on whether t is a static array.
which is something that you cannot do in a type function.
You cannot change the form of the function body.
Type functions are not polymorphic, they cannot change shape.
Besides is there ever a case in which A.sizeOf * n
would not be the same as t.sizeof ?
> Basically, is the implementation at a level where sizeOf can be
> turtles all the way down, with minimal or no reliance on
I'd guess you would have higher reliance on __traits simply
because __traits have a return value and can be pure, as opposed
to pattern matching is expressions which can change things
outside of their contexts.
More information about the Digitalmars-d