Discussion Thread: DIP 1036--Formatted String Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 1
alexanderheistermann at gmail.com
Fri Sep 11 14:05:51 UTC 2020
On Friday, 11 September 2020 at 13:46:52 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> On Friday, 11 September 2020 at 13:19:37 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
>> On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 20:50:24 UTC, Paul Backus
>> That issue that I have with your stance, is that we are
>> dealing with c/c++ bindings here. How is c/c++ responsible in
>> this case? You are asking the binder maintainer to create a
>> wrapper to prevent accident function call.
> Yes, that's exactly what I'm asking. Note that this is
> something D *already* does when it provides wrappers like
> `writefln` as alternatives to C functions like `printf`, so in
> practice, it should not require any new work to be done.
You conflicting standard library feature with built in language
feature here, they are not the same.
More information about the Digitalmars-d