Discussion Thread: DIP 1036--Formatted String Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 1

[12345swordy]

On Friday, 11 September 2020 at 13:46:52 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> On Friday, 11 September 2020 at 13:19:37 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
>> On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 20:50:24 UTC, Paul Backus 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> That issue that I have with your stance, is that we are 
>> dealing with c/c++ bindings here. How is c/c++ responsible in 
>> this case? You are asking the binder maintainer to create a 
>> wrapper to prevent accident function call.
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I'm asking. Note that this is 
> something D *already* does when it provides wrappers like 
> `writefln` as alternatives to C functions like `printf`, so in 
> practice, it should not require any new work to be done.

You conflicting standard library feature with built in language 
feature here, they are not the same.