Discussion Thread: DIP 1036--Formatted String Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 1
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Fri Sep 11 18:24:25 UTC 2020
On Friday, 11 September 2020 at 18:16:10 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> an opaque runtime-defined type.
Frankly, I hate the opaque thing too and it is going to change.
In my mind, it *must* be introspectable to be useful (without
that, it also fails test #8 btw).
The sample implementation in the DIP its all these points, but
the spec text doesn't. We had a hard time figuring out how to
word it in spec-ese and kinda gave up, but it is obvious that
giving up on that was a major mistake that we're going to go back
and correct after this feedback round.
More information about the Digitalmars-d