Is phobos too fluffy?

[Imperatorn]

On Saturday, 19 September 2020 at 11:29:37 UTC, Russel Winder 
wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-09-19 at 09:55 +0000, Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d 
> wrote:
>> 
> […]
>> I get the point in doing so. What I mean is that explains why 
>> Phobos is "fluffy" then, and it's probably not a problem
>
> I suspect getting data before coming to a view is probably the 
> wise thing to do. Andrei's "fluffiness" may be an issue of unit 
> tests, but given the posts in the thread I get the feeling it 
> is more than just that.

What I meant is maybe it's not top priority