Ghosting a language feature
kuettler at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 09:33:44 UTC 2020
On Monday, 21 September 2020 at 09:06:50 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
> On Monday, 21 September 2020 at 02:43:57 UTC, Walter Bright
>> On 9/20/2020 7:38 PM, Avrina wrote:
>>> why not just remove it so no one uses it.
>> Because legacy code will use it. Removing features has been a
>> constant source of irritation to users, and they're right.
> In conclusion, I simply hope we keep on putting more
> consideration into why people come to D, as opposed to why
> people say they won't. And people come to D not for a language
> that has eternal backwards compatibility, because one simply
> can use C++ for this.
Maybe taking a look at why people are leaving D could be
instructive, too? Speaking of ghosting.
And think of the unspeakable pleasure of ghosting a Voldemort
type. Or a callback handler. "Don't call us, we won't call you
either." The possibilities are endless.
More information about the Digitalmars-d