Adding the ?. operator to D
Atila Neves
atila.neves at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 12:08:40 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 19:38:01 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 9/17/20 3:33 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
>> On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 07:06:24 UTC,
>> FeepingCreature wrote:
>>> It only requires the change that || return the merged truthy
>>> type of its parameters rather than bool. For instance, for
>>> objects 'a || b' would merge to the most derived superclass
>>> of a and b.
>>
>> That is an interesting idea. Which statically typed languages
>> has taken a similar approach? I wonder what Andrei thinks
>> about this.
>
> I recall Perl does something similar with its "or" operator.
> Changing || that way now would be too much breakage.
Perl5 has `or` *and* `||` and they have different precedence
because, well, it's Perl.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list