Feedback Thread: DIP 1041--Attributes for Higher-Order Functions--Community Review Round 1

[Q. Schroll]

On Monday, 12 April 2021 at 15:28:16 UTC, Max Haughton wrote:
> On Monday, 12 April 2021 at 09:38:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> ## Feedback Thread
>>
>> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community 
>> Review of DIP 1041, "Attributes for Higher-Order Functions".
>>
>> [...]
>
> I'm still processing this DIP so substantive critique will 
> arrive later, but the first thing that comes to mind is that 
> this DIP really really needs to go on a diet - compartmentalize 
> the changes into a section *then* rationalize them.

If you can, tell me which parts you deem unnecessary (answer to 
this message). I know that the text is long. The format of a DIP 
as I understood it (Rationale first, Description second, required 
to be separate sections) doesn't really allow section-wise 
description and rationalization.