Tasks, actors and garbage collection

[12345swordy]

On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 13:54:47 UTC, russhy wrote:
> On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 13:43:21 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
>> On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 13:40:18 UTC, russhy wrote:
>>> On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 06:35:25 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 19:41:39 UTC, russhy wrote:
>>>>>> We already have zig and rust, adding yet another fancy 
>>>>>> slick no GC landuage is dead end.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Same defeatist mentality i keep reading here, this is not 
>>>>> what D need
>>>>>
>>>>>> So please stop your no-GC whine. People already heard you, 
>>>>>> more than once too.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will never stop fighting for D from the people who wants 
>>>>> to ruin it with more GC
>>>>
>>>> D is open source, you are free to take care of your special 
>>>> flavoured D.
>>>
>>> say this to the people who want to ruin D with more GC, they 
>>> are free to make their own fork caleld DJava
>>
>> This is just pure GC phobia at this point of time.
>>
>> -Alex
>
>
> Not, i never said GC is useless, i said the language shouldn't 
> expect a GC to exists, it should ask you to provide what ever 
> allocation scheme you need for the task
That is just pure nonsense. Having the gc built into the language 
have noticeable benefits.

-Alex