Empty non-null Associative Arrays should be trivial or even the default.

[Rekel]

On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 at 16:20:50 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> You mean, doing something like `aa["foo"]` gives you the range 
> violation? That's intended. If the key was never assigned, it's 
> just like trying to index a normal array with a value that's 
> out of bounds. The proper way to check for an element in an AA 
> is via `in`, which returns a pointer to the element if it 
> exists and null if it doesn't:

Yes, you are absolutely correct. You've been faster at responding 
than I have been at backtracking my previous statements, that is 
very impressive 😅, thanks for helping out.