How can one reliably run unittests
Mathias LANG
geod24 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 26 04:12:56 UTC 2021
On Wednesday, 25 August 2021 at 11:11:24 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
> Disagree. I'm fine with the simple unittest experience, and
> avoiding putting all this kind of bloat into the runtime.
>
> -Steve
What bloat ? Is it the amount of code needed, or the binary size
that bothers you ?
For the former, we already have many framework doing this, so
there's a real interest in having it, and having it in a single
place means that improvements will be centralized, instead of
being duplicated. So, less code bloat when you look at the big
picture.
For the later, I've never seen anyone bother about unittest
binary size. I don't think we should. And if the unittest
framework code ends up in the binary when `-unittest` is not
used, we're doing it wrong.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list