paolo.invernizzi at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 08:51:12 UTC 2021
On Monday, 1 February 2021 at 02:49:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
> On 1/31/21 7:43 PM, Der wrote:
>> On Monday, 1 February 2021 at 00:25:42 UTC, Steven
>> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> Probably a phobos 2.0 thing.
>> Is this under serious consideration, or is it merely the
>> optimists' fervent dream.
> Walter, Andrei, Atila and I are discussing for about 4 months.
> I have only been involved since then, not sure what the plans
> were before that.
> This is not a facetious thing. We are trying to determine the
> best way to create a phobos v2 that does not break existing
> code. I don't know what it will look like, or if we can come up
> with something that is workable soon. But we are working on it.
> The thing that I'm most interested in is no autodecoding. But
> of course, with a place where we can create breaking changes
> that live in an "opt-in" space, it opens the door to a lot of
> other things that we may want to include.
I would like to have a clear path to _increment_ it right now:
A clear policy and a final word simple additions like that would
More information about the Digitalmars-d