DIP1027 + Design by Introspection

[Paul Backus]

On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 17:39:06 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 17:04:47 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
>> DIP 1036 has plenty of advantages compared to DIP 1027, but 
>> trying to pretend it is a simpler proposal is just dishonest.
>
> I thought the only thing everyone could agree on was that 
> DIP1027 is less complex, at least I could get the gist of it in 
> an instant in contrast to DIP1036.

Did you mean to reply to Adam instead of me? I agree with 
you--DIP 1027 is less complex than DIP 1036.