DIP1027 + Design by Introspection

[Daniel N]

On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 17:56:32 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 17:39:06 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 17:04:47 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
>>> DIP 1036 has plenty of advantages compared to DIP 1027, but 
>>> trying to pretend it is a simpler proposal is just dishonest.
>>
>> I thought the only thing everyone could agree on was that 
>> DIP1027 is less complex, at least I could get the gist of it 
>> in an instant in contrast to DIP1036.
>
> Did you mean to reply to Adam instead of me? I agree with 
> you--DIP 1027 is less complex than DIP 1036.

My bad again ;) Yes!