Lazy formatting

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 20:03:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On 2/2/21 2:50 PM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 18:50:00 UTC, Steven 
>> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> On 2/2/21 3:51 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
>>>> On Monday, 1 February 2021 at 02:49:37 UTC, Steven 
>>>> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> I would like to have a clear path to _increment_ it right 
>>>> now:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/6730
>>>>
>>>> A clear policy and a final word simple additions like that 
>>>> would be great.
>>>
>>> That's a prime example of what a phobos v2 would allow. No 
>>> code breakage, and provides a saner interface for future 
>>> projects.
>>>
>> 
>> I underline that adding a new better method, is not a breakage 
>> ...
>> 
>
> Adding @nogc to a method that's overridable that was previously 
> not @nogc is breakage. That's the point of the folks in that 
> review.
>
> -Steve

I agree with you, that's why I simply suggested to _add_ a new 
better method, and pointed also to precedents for that practise 
in Phobos ...

But despite that, the point is NOT having a policy for such 
common improvements, and that why there was a call to authority 
...