Lazy formatting

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 20:33:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On 2/2/21 3:08 PM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 20:03:18 UTC, Steven 
>> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>>
>>> Adding @nogc to a method that's overridable that was 
>>> previously not @nogc is breakage. That's the point of the 
>>> folks in that review.
>>>
>> 
>> I agree with you, that's why I simply suggested to _add_ a new 
>> better method, and pointed also to precedents for that 
>> practise in Phobos ...
>> 
>> But despite that, the point is NOT having a policy for such 
>> common improvements, and that why there was a call to 
>> authority ...
>
> OK, I was misunderstanding what you were saying (I may still 
> not understand it),

Sorry for my bad phrasing ... you are understanding it rightly :-P

> but yes, we are trying to find a way to do  these kinds of 
> improvements.

Steven, it's a two years waiting for a trivial addition to an 
obsoleted (definition coming from the PR discussion) module.

This thing start to smell more like "we don't care" that "we are 
carefully studying how hight to put the bar"