Discussion Thread: DIP 1036--String Interpolation Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 2

Dukc ajieskola at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 20:36:44 UTC 2021


On Wednesday, 3 February 2021 at 16:38:15 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> First, I'd suggest instrumenting the positions instead of the 
> data, since that's the exceptional case:
>
> [snip]
>
> And now, you can use interpolation strings as the "things to 
> write" without ambiguity. You can even use a single 
> interpolation string (with the positions being interpolation 
> parameters). I would say the non-interpolation form is better 
> for when you are just passing in parameters, and the 
> interpolation form is great when you want, well, interpolations.
>
> I get the thrust of what you are saying. But technically, if 
> you are having to reengineer the function to deal with 
> interpolation strings, you should rethink how the API works.

Good, obviously you got the point and your answer sounds 
convincing enough that I don't think there's need for me to argue 
about that one any further.




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list