Anyone in touch with codecov team ? We need assert(0); and assert(false); lines to be ignored

[Basile B.]

On Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 12:30:36 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 11:17:29 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> I see criticism comming, such as "they cannot handle 
>> assert(/*yeah*/false/**/)", but I think that this does not 
>> matter. The regexes for the two most common cases would be 
>> great to get more accurate reports.
>
> I think the appropriate place to fix this would be in the 
> compiler. This is where the information of whether a line is 
> eligible for coverage originates. (In DMD listings, it's the 
> difference between a line starting with "       |" and


yeah that's a nice alternative, no need to mess with the codecov 
team if we truncate the report.