Anyone in touch with codecov team ? We need assert(0); and assert(false); lines to be ignored
Basile B.
b2.temp at gmx.com
Thu Feb 11 13:54:29 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 13:27:45 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 12:30:36 UTC, Vladimir
> Panteleev wrote:
>> On Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 11:17:29 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>> I see criticism comming, such as "they cannot handle
>>> assert(/*yeah*/false/**/)", but I think that this does not
>>> matter. The regexes for the two most common cases would be
>>> great to get more accurate reports.
>>
>> I think the appropriate place to fix this would be in the
>> compiler. This is where the information of whether a line is
>> eligible for coverage originates. (In DMD listings, it's the
>> difference between a line starting with " |" and
>
>
> yeah that's a nice alternative, no need to mess with the
> codecov team if we truncate the report.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21630
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list