Discussion on static reflection syntax in C++

H. S. Teoh hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx
Mon Feb 22 23:55:24 UTC 2021

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:35:31PM +1300, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 23/02/2021 7:22 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
> > Oh great! The named parameter proposal for c++ is got to be the worst
> > version of named parameters that I ever seen!
> > https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/g/std-proposals/c/3dUkwyp2Ie4/m/rZ8dgxVlCgAJ
> They really went with the kitchen sink approach didn't they?
> Yikes.

Seeing as this is C++ we're talking about, a kitchen sink approach
doesn't surprise me. (Even if it does disgust me. :-D)


Life is too short to run proprietary software. -- Bdale Garbee

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list