Tuple DIP

[Paul Backus]

On Sunday, 3 January 2021 at 05:44:57 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 01.01.21 19:53, Rekel wrote:
>> Slightly unrelated, but wouldn't it be better to change the 
>> comma operator to a different symbol entirely?
>
> Ideally we'd just add tuple syntax and then use (..,..,..)[$-1] 
> as a replacement for the comma operator.

Since using the value of a comma expression is currently 
forbidden, it should be fine to replace comma expressions with 
tuple expressions as long as the order of evaluation remains the 
same.