Only want to say

[ddcovery]

On Monday, 11 January 2021 at 14:06:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> ...
>
> I highly doubt we will remove body in that syntax. The DIP 
> proposed that, but that was under the expectation that we 
> couldn't remove body as a keyword without also removing its 
> support in that position.
>
> Today, body is *not* a keyword, but can be used there. I don't 
> think it will ever change. See the PR that was reverted because 
> it affected a lot of code: 
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10763
>
> And I have to say, this is quite the overreaction. "body" vs. 
> "do" is not the thing that makes contracts function, let alone 
> should cause you to doubt the future of D.
>
> But this is kind of a side-thing, I'm glad you are loving the 
> language, I share that emotion completely!
>
> -Steve

100,000 apologies, Steve. You're right: it was an overreaction.

The cause is not about do vs body (well, partly yes)... it is 
about an accepted DIP telling that Contract programming is not 
enough important in D community and can be belittled... I have to 
recognize that it was a shock for me (because it is,with scope, 
the basis of all scripting I'm working with D, and one of the 
most used arguments in some posts in quora or when I present D to 
other developers).

Thank you very much for clarifying the situation so quickly.