[Joke] C++ and D namings

Ola Fosheim Grostad ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Wed Jan 20 04:15:44 UTC 2021


On Wednesday, 20 January 2021 at 03:56:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
> Okay, useless in terms of static guarantees, and definitely 
> compared to nothrow (or even Java's exception specifications 
> IMO). It's not *completely* useless, just mostly useless.

In c++ most things are related to performance, and then you leave 
expensive static analysis to optional external tools.

Noexecpt tells the codegen to emit more efficient code.







More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list