[Joke] C++ and D namings
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 15:35:40 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 21 January 2021 at 12:14:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> Yup, one things that people miss is that noexcept actually
> makes things more expensive because the compiler has to add
> checks that you aren't throwing something. These are runtime
> checks that happen when unwinding an exception.
I would assume that only applies when calling functions in other
compilation units? The throws within the noexcept function should
just be replace with a call to std::terminate?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list