Feedback Thread: DIP 1036--String Interpolation Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 2

Steven Schveighoffer schveiguy at
Wed Jan 27 12:41:00 UTC 2021

On 1/27/21 6:33 AM, jmh530 wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 January 2021 at 10:33:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> [snip]
> Typo in the second sentence
> The DIP does not account for operator overloading on strings. A DIP 
> author that the specific example given was not possible to support, but 
> it can work with custom types.

You had me confused for a while, I didn't remember writing anything like 
that. But it's part of the review piece I didn't touch that Mike added 
after the first round. Should say "A DIP author *replied* that..."


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list