D vs C++ classes?
alexandru.ermicioi at gmail.com
Thu Jul 1 20:55:30 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 12:18:38 UTC, zjh wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 11:26:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
>> On Wednesday, 30 June 2021 at 14:13:23 UTC, Alexandru Ermicioi
> D `should not` forget the original intention:
> D is a system level language.
D is a general purpose programming language not just systems
> C++ is our good friend.
> I always say `compete with C++` and `learn from C++`.
This should not be only from C++, but all languages.
> `Better C++` is always good for attracting people.
I'm not against better C++ interop, and would like to have it.
I'm against adjusting core features of D just to make it
compatible with C++ without using extern (C++) modifier, in other
words not opt in.
> Recently, I find V language, and its many feature are copying
> from `D` language,though `Go++,rust--`.
> And now they have `24000` star.
> I always say `Better C++` is the right way.
Well, I'm also for better C++ interop, just not for the sake of
sacrificing flexibility of a language to evolve.
More information about the Digitalmars-d