RFC: DIP draft for "Compiler-defined Attribute Consistency"
dkorpel at gmail.com
Wed Jul 14 18:01:15 UTC 2021
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 17:45:34 UTC, user1234 wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 16:18:21 UTC, Dennis wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 15:54:06 UTC, user1234 wrote:
>>> I'm worried not to see `@const` and `@inout`.
>> Those are type constructors, not attributes.
> I reffered about the [attribute form of
> const](https://dlang.org/spec/attribute.html#const), e.g we
> would have
I didn't know the spec considers them attributes, I stand
corrected. I still think it's a separate proposal though, since
this DIP is about consistency among function attributes, not the
confusing syntax of member functions with type attributes.
More information about the Digitalmars-d