RFC: DIP draft for "Compiler-defined Attribute Consistency"

bauss jj_1337 at live.dk
Fri Jul 16 06:47:57 UTC 2021

On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 16:02:01 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 15:54:06 UTC, user1234 wrote:
>>> Comments very welcome.
> I don't like that @attr is colliding with UDA.
> It would be nice to have # for attr and @ for uda (or 
> viceversa).

I would rather have seen built-in attributes having no prefix ex. 
just safe, nogc etc.

Basically the opposite of making the rest of the attributes 
having @ too.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list