Enum literals, good? bad? what do you think?

[Adam D Ruppe]

On Wednesday, 21 July 2021 at 07:12:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> ```d
> enum expandEnum(EnumType, string fqnEnumType = 
> EnumType.stringof) = (){

Eeek, this is awful. It uses .stringof which means it is 
automatically stinky. It is liable for trouble when anything 
other than basic imports get involved.

If you are going to do this kind of thing as a mixin at all, a 
mixin template is far more appropriate. It avoids the scope 
trouble since it can use the unambiguous local name.

But when there's `with`.... none of this stuff gains you 
anything. It doesn't get closer to the Swift examples.