@system blocks and safer @trusted (ST) functions
Paul Backus
snarwin at gmail.com
Sun Jul 25 14:38:18 UTC 2021
On Sunday, 25 July 2021 at 14:34:27 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
>
> I'd like to have assistance from the compiler to the maximum
> extent possible and then conduct the code review(s). Assuming
> low (near zero) false positives out of the compiler, I'm not
> sure why one would prefer manual checking when compiler
> checking was available, but that option is certainly available
> in both the current and proposed environments.
Under your proposal, the proportion of code that must be
manually-checked vs. compiler-checked does not change at all.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list