Let's get the semantic around closure fixed.

Ola Fosheim Grøstad ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Tue Jun 1 00:12:19 UTC 2021


On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 23:37:21 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> I think it is unavoidable. DIP1000 and alike are just doing 
> exactly that while pretending they aren't, and it is causing a 
> parsing XML with regex kind of running problem - it looks like 
> it'll actually work, but it doesn't.

True, no point in avoiding the machinery if that is what one is 
aiming for. Better to take the full machinery with explicit 
annotations, and then provide syntactical sugar for the common 
case if that is desirable. Going the other way will most likely 
be messy.





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list