DIP1000: The return of 'Extend Return Scope Semantics'

[Walter Bright]

On 5/26/2021 5:44 PM, tsbockman wrote:
> Why must it always be the first parameter, instead of always being the last 
> parameter, etc.? The choice of **which** parameter gets special treatment is 
> arbitrary, and is the part I was complaining about because of how it interacts 
> with UFCS.

It is not arbitrary. It actually fits with common Phobos usage. It is especially 
true if one writes member functions for a container, doing things like:

    stack.push(value);

where value is a pointer.