Any way to peek at the exception currently being thrown?
kdevel
kdevel at vogtner.de
Thu Jun 17 21:51:56 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 17 June 2021 at 20:59:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
[...]
>> Why don't you make the COMMIT explicit (by implementing commit
>> method) and let the destructor ROLLBACK the transactino
>> unconditionally?
>
> Yeah, that's possible, but then I still have to do:
>
> auto txn = conn.beginTransaction;
> scope(success) txn.commit;
>
> In which the `commit` call only does something on the
> outer-most txn.
>
> Not much better. And a bit awkward.
You have nested transactions txn1, ... txnN. Then there is a path
thru the code having a line when all transactions are to be
commited. Why don't you explicitly write
tnxN.commit;
:
tnx1.commit;
or whatever the appropriate order is? Why do you hide the commit
(side effect!) in a scope exit?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list