Discussion Thread: DIP 1035-- at system Variables--Community Review Round 2

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Wed Mar 3 03:11:13 UTC 2021


On 02.03.21 23:15, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
> On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 09:21:20 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>>
>> The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET on March 11, or when I make 
>> a post declaring it complete. Discussion in this thread may continue 
>> beyond that point.
>>
>> Here in the discussion thread, you are free to discuss anything and 
>> everything related to the DIP. Express your support or opposition, 
>> debate alternatives, argue the merits, etc.
>>
> 
> So, in a few words, the merit of the DIP is that after this change, you 
> have to review only @trusted functions to ensure a @safe function hasn't 
> broken an invariant of the aggregate.
> 
> Which is strange to me since I was under the impression @safe/@trusted 
> was only about memory safety. But in a way it makes sense to use it for 
> "general bugs" since @trusted function will be audited. So, no real 
> opinion here. Why not.

@system variables are still about memory safety.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list