Back in D after some absence, some perspective

[deadalnix]

On Monday, 8 March 2021 at 11:01:17 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 02.03.21 22:05, deadalnix wrote:
>> I think it is hard too argue that D doesn't have enough 
>> feature at this time.
>
> OTOH, there is no pattern matching, in particular you can't 
> pattern match tuples. Therefore, it is also very hard to argue 
> that D is feature-complete. (Has it skipped leg day?)

While pattern matching would be nice, I place soundness above it. 
Plus, if you look at the SDC codebase for instance, you'll see 
that you can go pretty far as a library.