Appreciation for Adrdox
Imperatorn
johan_forsberg_86 at hotmail.com
Thu May 13 22:40:12 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 13 May 2021 at 04:23:26 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
> Hi Adam Ruppe
>
> Just wanted to drop a note of thanks for your documentation
> generator.
>
> It's nice!
>
> My internal project has become complicated enough that proper
> documentation
> seemed to be in order. Over the course of today I've tested
> three systems:
>
> * straight ddoc generated via dmd
> * ddox via dub -b ddox
> * and adrdox.
>
> I found the output of adrdox to be the most visually appealing
> of the three
> and the easiest to navigate. In addition it also had the least
> number of bugs
> (zero so far).
>
> Since documentation is the first thing a new user notices about
> a library, I
> thank you for helping me to make a good first impression for my
> work.
>
> Best,
Agreed! Adam deserves a medal (autocorrect suggested medley 🎶?)
for helping us all! (Also he's a 100x dev but does "one file dev"
so you have to divide by 10 but still a 10x:er) 🥉
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list