Appreciation for Adrdox

Imperatorn johan_forsberg_86 at hotmail.com
Thu May 13 22:40:12 UTC 2021


On Thursday, 13 May 2021 at 04:23:26 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
> Hi Adam Ruppe
>
> Just wanted to drop a note of thanks for your documentation 
> generator.
>
>   It's nice!
>
> My internal project has become complicated enough that proper 
> documentation
> seemed to be in order.  Over the course of today I've tested 
> three systems:
>
>   * straight ddoc generated via dmd
>   * ddox via dub -b ddox
>   * and adrdox.
>
> I found the output of adrdox to be the most visually appealing 
> of the three
> and the easiest to navigate.  In addition it also had the least 
> number of bugs
> (zero so far).
>
> Since documentation is the first thing a new user notices about 
> a library, I
> thank you for helping me to make a good first impression for my 
> work.
>
> Best,

Agreed! Adam deserves a medal (autocorrect suggested medley 🎶?) 
for helping us all! (Also he's a 100x dev but does "one file dev" 
so you have to divide by 10 but still a 10x:er) 🥉


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list