Plan for D

[Ola Fosheim Grostad]

On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 10:11:10 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 09:47:45 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad 
> wrote:
>> Well, what I said is considered a norm in academic circles. So 
>> the belief that compilers is a show case is not uncommon.
>>
>> I would never judge a standard library as they tend to be 
>> affected by issues related to code gen and OS. The standard 
>> library is kinda part of the compiler backend and runtime. It 
>> is common for standard libs to be unidiomatic.
>
> So, if I understood right you're criticizing DMD 
> implementation, not D memory management options?

There should be other options, but if you have a solution for DMD 
then it would be expexted to be enabled by default. If it isn't, 
how can you expect pergformance conscious system level 
programmers to think there is an good solution available? Show 
not tell...